[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070214194112.5bec3110.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:41:12 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, herbert.xu@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com,
arjan@...radead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] MODSIGN: Kernel module signing
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:09:38 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> These patches provide a GPG-based kernel module signing facility. Their use is
> not fully automated within the confines of the kernel build process because it
> needs provision of keys from outside of the kernel before the kernel can be
> compiled.
>
> The patches are:
>
> (1) A cut-down MPI library derived from GPG with error handling added.
>
> (2) Permit hash algorithms to hash kernel data defined by a virtual address
> and a length rather than trying to use scattergather lists (which require
> struct page pointers to be determined).
>
> (3) Add extra information to the per-arch ELF headers to more fully describe
> the format of the ELF metadata.
>
> (4) Add module verification capabilities, including ELF metadata verification.
>
> (5) Add a generic DSA signature checker. Given a SHA1 hash of the data to be
> verified and a binary blob holding a GPG signature stream, this verifies
> the signature using a built-in ring of public keys.
>
> (6) Add a module signature checker that applies signature checking to modules
> on module load, checking the signature against the ring of public keys
> compiled into the kernel.
Grand total:
77 files changed, 9681 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
just to be able to sign modules.
Normally I'd collapse writhing in laughter, but..
> These patches have been in use by RHEL and Fedora kernels for years, and so
> have been thoroughly tested.
so I guess there's an argument for merging them so we can send them back to
you guys. But there's also an argument to declare all this gunk a
vendor-only thing. How much pain would that cause?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists