[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702142135.40832.agruen@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:35:40 -0800
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, herbert.xu@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...radead.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] MODSIGN: Kernel module signing
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:13, Dave Jones wrote:
> I've not investigated it, but I hear rumours that suse has something
> similar.
Actually, no. We don't belive that module signing adds significant value, and
it also doesn't work well with external modules. (The external modules we
really care about are GPL ones; it gives us a way to update drivers without
pushing out entirely new kernels.)
Cheers,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists