[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070216051823.GA9195@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:48:23 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Antoine Martin <antoine@...afix.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug() - 2.6.18.6
Hi Antoine,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:59:05PM +0000, Antoine Martin wrote:
> I just caught this in the log whilst running some unit tests.
> (the test was in the process of starting 900 Java threads)
>
> audit(1171565587.887:96): enforcing=0 old_enforcing=1 auid=4294967295
> BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug()
>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff80269c98>] dump_stack+0x12/0x17
> [<ffffffff8029dfe6>] unlock_cpu_hotplug+0x3f/0x6c
> [<ffffffff802876b6>] sched_getaffinity+0x7d/0xa2
> [<ffffffff80287701>] sys_sched_getaffinity+0x26/0x55
> [<ffffffff8025cb0e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
Looks like one of those spurious unlock_cpu_hotplug warnings.
Let me know if this fix works for you or not.
regards
gautham.
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
kernel/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.18/kernel/cpu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18.orig/kernel/cpu.c
+++ linux-2.6.18/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ void unlock_cpu_hotplug(void)
recursive_depth--;
return;
}
- mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
recursive = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_cpu_hotplug);
--
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists