| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <75b66ecd0702151618g752dcd10p99b17ad20a81569c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:18:52 -0500 From: "Lee Revell" <rlrevell@...-job.com> To: "Greg Trounson" <gregt@...hs.otago.ac.nz> Cc: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers On 2/15/07, Greg Trounson <gregt@...hs.otago.ac.nz> wrote: > Theodore Tso wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:27:10PM -0800, v j wrote: > >> You are right. I have not contributed anything to Linux. Except one > >> small patch to the MTD code. However, I don't think that is the point > >> here. I am perfectly willing to live with the way Linux is today. I am > >> telling you as a user that if Linux continues on the current path it > >> will become less and less attractive to Embedded Users. > > > > But so what? How will that hurt *Linux*? If the Embedded developers > > don't contribute changes back, it doesn't hurt us any if they go away > > and start paying $$$ to VxWorks instead of using Linux for free. > > I disagree. Linux needs popularity at the moment. Um... what's your point? Allowing vendors to legally ship embedded devices containing proprietary drivers would require relicensing the kernel which is impossible, for reasons that have been discussed at length on this list. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists