[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070215230611.d89e26be.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:06:11 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 14/21] Xen-paravirt: Add XEN config options and disable
unsupported config options.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:14:45 -0800 Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com> wrote:
> > config PREEMPT
> > bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
> > + depends on !XEN
> > help
> > This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
> > all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
> >
Oh, so that's why it doesn't break when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y. In which case
that preempt_disable() I spotted is wrong-and-unneeded.
Why doesn't Xen work with preemption??
> I hate to sound like a broken record, but this really isn't the right
> way to do this. If you are going to inhibit config settings when Xen
> support is compiled, then it should be:
>
> config XEN
> depends on !KEXEC && !DOUBLEFAULT && HZ_100 && !PREEMPT
>
Agree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists