linux-kernel - Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45D561CA.3080609@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:48:26 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
	Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 12/21] Xen-paravirt: Allocate and free vmalloc areas

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:08:02 -0800 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>>This won't work when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y.  The pagefault handler will see
>>>in_atomic() and will scram.
>>>  
>>
>>Is there some other way to get the pagetable populated for the address
>>range?
>>
> 
> 
> If you really need to run atomically, that gets ugly.  Even of one were to
> run handle_mm_fault() by hand, it still needs to allocate memory.
> 
> Two ugly options might be:
> 
> a) touch all the pages, then go atomic, then touch them all again.  If
>    one of them faults (ie: you raced with swapout) then go back and try
>    again.  Obviously susceptible to livelocking.
> 
> b) Do get_user_pages() against all the pages, then go atomic, then do
>    put_page() against them all.  Of course, they can immediately get
>    swapped out.
> 
> But that function's already racy against swapout and I guess it works OK. 
> I don't have clue what it is actually trying to do, so I'm guessing madly
> here.

Well its only operating on kernel pages, and against a vmalloc region.
So it would be immune to any sort of unmapping or swapout.

Andrew's option a) should work. What's this for, and how is it not Xen
specific if nothing else in the tree needs such a weird hack?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/