[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702160133.14330.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 01:33:13 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch
On Thursday 15 February 2007 22:50, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Is this 1.5ms with interrupts disabled? This time period is problematic
> from a realtime perspective if so -- need to be able to preempt.
No, interrupts should be enabled here. Still, 1.5ms is probably a little
too long without a cond_resched() in case kernel preemption is disabled.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists