[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C1FB3FEA.98F7%keir@xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:03:06 +0000
From: Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>
CC: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@...source.com>,
<virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Steven Hand <steven.hand@...cam.ac.uk>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...source.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 14/21] Xen-paravirt: Add XEN config options and
disableunsupported config options.
On 16/2/07 10:54, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> OK, you're screwed. I agree that the process freezer is the way out of that
> one.
>
> Ingo said that he's clocked the freezer at a few milliseconds. But if it's
> any higher than that it'll need to get sped up once we convert cpu hotplug
> to use it.
A few milliseconds is acceptable. Presumably that is under some stress
workload? What we'd really like is to be able to gang-hotplug CPUs to
amortise the freezer overhead.
This initial patchset does not include save/restore support anyway, so in
fact it would be consistent to have CONFIG_PREEMPT configurable. I'm sure
that we are going to have some nasty bugs to fix up as a result, but we
can't fix them until we find them! Then we can convert our save/restore code
to use the freezer before submitting it for inclusion.
-- Keir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists