[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702161206.40483.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:06:39 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: vatsa@...ibm.com
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
akpm@...l.org, paulmck@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
dipankar@...ibm.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 1/4] freezer-cpu-hotplug core
On Friday, 16 February 2007 10:59, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:29:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, the suspend code has been developed with the assumption that frozen
> > threads stay frozen until _we_ let them thaw by calling thaw_processes(). I'm
> > a bit afraid of this change.
>
> Note that only kernel threads created thr' kthread_create are allowed
> to exit like this from the refrigerator, that too only when
> (kthread_stop_info.k == current). So all other threads should be unaffected
> because of this change.
Yes, that's why I said "a bit". ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists