[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070216133545.GB3036@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:35:46 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: NUMA replicated pagecache
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:29:29PM -0500, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
>
> I've attached another patch that closes one race and fixes a context
> problem [irq/preemption state] in __unreplicate_page_range(). This
> makes the locking even uglier :-(.
>
> I get further with this patch. Boot all the way up and can run fine
> with page replication. However, I still get a NULL pcd in
> find_get_page_readonly() when attempting a highly parallel kernel build
> [16cpu/4node numa platform]. I'm still trying to track that down.
OK, before you get further with your testing, I have done a rework. Sorry
you had to wade through that last lot of uncommented spaghetti. This
upcoming version should actually be a reasonable base to do testing and
development on.
> Question about locking: looks like the pcache_descriptor members are
> protected by the tree_lock of the mapping, right?
Yes. I figured that this would be cleanest and simplest for now. This
locking model is retained in the rework.
Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists