[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702161718.23806.mista.tapas@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:18:23 +0100
From: Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@....net>
To: Mike Panetta <m.panetta@...ener.com>
Cc: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: APIC priorities, can they be changed?
On Thursday 15 February 2007, Mike Panetta wrote:
> I did try that. The BIOS only allows me to either allocate an IRQ to be
> a PCI interrupt, or reserve it (for what I have no idea). The IRQ's
> listed in the BIOS are also different from the ones Linux sees. I think
> the BIOS is seeing the XT-PIC IRQ numbers and Linux is seeing the APIC
> numbers. For example the little bios blurb that prints before the
> system boots says the USB controller I am interested in is
> assigned/using IRQ 10, Linux sees it using IRQ 18.
>
> I have found that I can keep Linux from using the APIC by disabling it
> with a kernel command line switch, but that does not help, it just makes
> Linux use the XT-PIC instead of the IO-APIC to do IRQ routing.
>
> So I guess I'm back to my original question of 'Would changing the
> vector numbers do what I want?' and if the answer is 'yes', how would I
> do it?
With XT-PIC, there was a way to change the priotrities used by the IRQ. It was
called irqtune iirc.
Ah ya,
http://cae.best.vwh.net/irqtune/
Dunno if there's something similar available for APIC..
Regards,
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists