linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] New driver information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070216173012.GQ13958@stusta.de>
Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:30:12 +0100
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	Heikki Orsila <shdl@...alwe.fi>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New driver information

On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:58:51PM +0200, Heikki Orsila wrote:
> I just read
> 
> 	http://kerneltrap.org/node/7729
> 
> and it occured to me that it would be informative to have a new device 
> driver macro. The motivation for the new macro would be 4 issues:
> 
> 	* Is it possible to get specifications for the device?
> 	* If yes, under what terms? (nda, public)
> 	* Where to get public specs?
> 	* How many closed and open drivers in the Linux source tree?
> 
> I suggest to add following macro:
> 
> MODULE_SPECIFICATION(terms, source);
> 
> where "terms" is one of
> 
>  * MODULE_SPEC_ANY_PARTY_NDA
> 	- specification available to any party for an NDA
>  * MODULE_SPEC_ANY_PARTY
> 	- specification available in public, or at least available 
> 	  without NDA to any party
>  * MODULE_SPEC_RESTRICTED
> 	- none of the above
> 
> and "source":
> 
>  * contact address for nda specs
>  * any public source for a public specification (http://, email address, 
>    ...)
>  * empty string otherwise
> 
> I realise this macro somewhat circumvents the purpose of Documentation/ 
> directory but the idea is to have a direct 1:1 mapping between drivers 
> and specification sources so that it would be easy to collect statistics 
> of "open" hardware by using grep et al.
> 
> What do you think? Useless annotations or useful information?

Useless, since noone will maintain this information (e.g. an
"email address" might no longer be valid several years from now, or a 
company might change the policies for releaseing information).

And also useless since there doesn't seem to be a serious use case.

> Heikki Orsila

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/