linux-kernel - Re: [patch 04/21] Xen-paravirt: ===================================================================

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45D5EABB.5090909@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:32:43 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/21] Xen-paravirt: ===================================================================

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Subject? description?
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 06:24:53PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> -static void vmi_set_pte_present(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>> +static void vmi_set_pte_present(struct mm_struct *mm, u32 addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
>>     
>
> And what good is that change anyways? unsigned long is the usual style
> for addresses.
There was a fair amount of inconsistency.  In this case, u32 was being
used for existing functions dealing with addresses, and I propagated it
through.  I can switch it all back to unsigned long if you'd prefer.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/