[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:52:56 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] killing the NR_IRQS arrays.
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 08:45:58PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 13:10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > To do this I believe will require a s/unsigned int irq/struct irq_desc *irq/
> > throughout the entire kernel. Getting the arch specific code and the
> > generic kernel infrastructure fixed and ready for that change looks
> > like a pain but pretty doable.
>
> We did something like this a few years back on the s390 architecture, which
> happens to be lucky enough not to share any interrupt based drivers with
> any of the other architectures.
What you're proposing is looking similar to a proposal I put forward some
4 years ago, but was rejected. Maybe times have changed and there's a
need for it now.
Message attached.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
Content of type "message/rfc822" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists