lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:52:56 +0000
From:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] killing the NR_IRQS arrays.

On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 08:45:58PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 13:10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > To do this I believe will require a s/unsigned int irq/struct irq_desc *irq/
> > throughout the entire kernel.  Getting the arch specific code and the
> > generic kernel infrastructure fixed and ready for that change looks
> > like a pain but pretty doable.
> 
> We did something like this a few years back on the s390 architecture, which
> happens to be lucky enough not to share any interrupt based drivers with
> any of the other architectures.

What you're proposing is looking similar to a proposal I put forward some
4 years ago, but was rejected.  Maybe times have changed and there's a
need for it now.

Message attached.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

Content of type "message/rfc822" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ