[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070216204336.GB4641@enneenne.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:43:36 +0100
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxpps@...enneenne.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] LinuxPPS: Pulse per Second support for Linux
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 07:12:08PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
>
> Yuck. Please. No. Doing it this way means you have to modify every
> single serial driver out there which is a mamouth task.
>
> > uart_handle_dcd_change(&up->port, status & UART_MSR_DCD);
>
> Did you not look to see what's in this helper? You'll find within here
> the following code:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HARD_PPS
> if ((port->flags & UPF_HARDPPS_CD) && status)
> hardpps();
> #endif
>
> which should've been a big sign lit up in bright lights in Times Square
> pointing you towards the right place to put your code.
Ok.
> Why not continue to leave it as a decision of the administrator - if
> you want ports to default to having PPS support enabled, change all
> the registration to set UPF_HARDPPS_CD. But leave the admin with
> the ability to disable it.
Ok.
> This means that PPS support is not available for any port which wasn't
> autoprobed at device discovery time. That seems quite restrictive.
How I can force probing for a specified uart port?
> Maybe it needs to be coupled with the setting/clearing of UPF_HARDPPS_CD ?
What do you think about? I should enable the PPS support only if the
userland sets the UPF_HARDPPS_CD flag?
Thanks for your comments,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@...eenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@...dd.com
Embedded Systems giometti@...ux.it
UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists