[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45D51248.5070408@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:12 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates (mostly fixes)
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>> index db185f3..d51f0f1 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ config IA64
>>
>> config 64BIT
>> bool
>> + select ATA_NONSTANDARD if ATA
>> default y
>
> Ok, this is just _strange_.
Agreed.
> Tying ATA_NONSTANDARD into ia64 by tying it to the 64BIT config variable
> may work (well, I _assume_ it does), but it's just psychedelic.
AFAICT it's an attempt to do an unconditional 'select'. I'm /not/
disputing its psychedilic properties, certainly, just figured that was
the way that IA64 arch folks did stuff like this.
> How about adding a separate config entry like
>
> config IA64_ATA
> bool
> depends on ATA
> select ATA_NONSTANDARD
> default y
>
> which kind of makes sense when you squint just the right way..
Either way, that seems sane to me. I'd love to have some IA64 folks to
comment though.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists