[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45D63F35.3000101@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:33:09 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 07/21] Xen-paravirt: remove ctor for pgd cache
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>
>> Remove the ctor for the pgd cache. There's no point in having the
>> cache machinery do this via an indirect call when all pgd are freed in
>> the one place anyway.
>>
>
> Great. We finally get rid of this evil .....
>
> On second throughts:
>
> Are you sure that you understand what you are modifying? The ctor is not
> called when you allocate an object but when the slab allocates it. Freeing
> an object does not make the slab free it. It will hold it for the next
> kmalloc. So you may just have reduced performance somewhat by addiung
> additional ctor processing and possibly disturbed the preservation of
> cache hot pgds.
It's true I wrote this patch as a result of accidentally reading slob.c
rather than slab.c, which was mostly as a result of hopeful thinking (I
knew that there has been discussion about removing all the slab cache
stuff, and I assumed that it had already happened). As a result I'm
withdrawing this patch for now, but with any luck it will be useful at
some point.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists