linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Move include linux/marker.h to kernel.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702171345140.20161@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Date:	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:50:43 +0100 (CET)
From:	Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move include linux/marker.h to kernel.h

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> No, that's still crufty.  There's no reason why marker.h needs special
> treatment whereas, say, jiffies.h does not (is there?)

Unforunately, even jiffies.h gets special treatment. sched.h still 
includes jiffies.h, as this is where it was originally defined.

I've had that on my to-do list for some years now, but unfortunately it 
will probably remain there for some more.
Somebody else who wants to check all files for properly including 
jiffies.h and then remove the include from sched.h?

Thanks,
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/