linux-kernel - Re: [patch 05/11] syslets: core code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070217175918.GA10307@cvg>
Date:	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:59:18 +0300
From:	"Cyrill V. Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	linux-kernel-list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/11] syslets: core code

On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:02:00PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
[... snipped ...]

| Yes, I only proposed to change what Ingo has right now - although it is
| usable, but it does suck, but since overall syslet design is indeed good
| it does not suffer from possible interface changes - so I said that it
| can be trivially changed in that regard that until it is committed
| anything can be done to extend it.
| 
| -- 
| 	Evgeniy Polyakov
| 

I think Evgeniy - you are right! For times of research _changing_ a lot
of things is almost a low. syslets are in test area and why should we
bound ourself in survey of best. If something in syslets is sucks so
lets change it as early as possible. Of course I mean no more interface
changing after some _commit_ point (and that should be Linus decision).

-- 

		Cyrill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/