linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:45:08 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
CC:	michael chang <thenewme91@...il.com>,
	ck mailing list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1

Con Kolivas wrote:
> Maintainers are far too busy off testing code for 
> 16+ cpus, petabytes of disk storage and so on to try it for themselves.  Plus 
> they worry incessantly that my patches may harm those precious machines' 
> performance... 
> 

But the one I like, mm-filesize_dependant_lru_cache_add.patch,
has an on-off switch.

In other words it adds an option to do things differently.
How could that possibly affect any workload if that option
isn't enabled?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/