[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702170237.42910.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:37:42 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] killing the NR_IRQS arrays.
On Friday 16 February 2007 23:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> You might want to have a look at the powerpc API with it's remaping
> capabilities. It's very nice for handling multiple domain spaces. It
> might be of some use for you.
I don't consider the powerpc virtual IRQs a solution for the problem.
While I believe you did the right thing for powerpc with generalizing
this over all its platforms, it really isn't more than a workaround
for the problem that we can't deal well with the static irq_desc
array.
When that problem is now getting worse on other architectures, we
should try to get it right on all of them, rather than spreading
the workaround further.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists