linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 17 Feb 2007 22:00:11 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Frank Haverkamp <haver@...t.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation

On Saturday 17 February 2007 17:55, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> 
> diff -auNrp tmp-from/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.c tmp-to/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.c
> --- tmp-from/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.c    1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
> +++ tmp-to/drivers/mtd/ubi/debug.c      2007-02-17 18:07:26.000000000 +0200

This whole file looks like it can be removed, as nothing in here
is really relevant for regular operation. I'm sure that much of it
was a good help in developing the code and finding the bugs in here,
but why would you want to merge it into the mainline kernel?

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/