| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:04:35 +0100 From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@...oo.it> To: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] x86_64: fix 2.6.18 regression - PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS should be accepted On Friday 16 February 2007 20:02, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:05:56PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Jeff, I verified my patch is _almost_ enough for 2.6.18 for fully booting > > a 32bit UML; on 2.6.18 I had to also add PTRACE_GET/SET_THREAD_AREA (this > > fix was merged in 2.6.19) to avoid tons of TLS errors. > > I'm not seeing that. With the current set of patches, I have 32-bit UMLs > happily booting on x86_64. Which kernel? I've not yet tested 2.6.20. I'll try debugging this subsequently. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list! Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists