[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702181715570.14457@scrub.home>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:24:36 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] override build timestamp
Hi,
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > Pass a timestamp to kbuild via an enviroment variable.
> > >
> > > TZ=UTC BUILD_TIMESTAMP=2007-01-01 make -kj O=../O vmlinux
> > >
> > > This can be used when the kernel source is in a SCM and uname -v
> > > is supposed to give the commit date and not the package build time.
> >
> > Is this really necessary? I don't really see the point of this.
>
> The package/kernel buildtime does not mean much, but the commit date
> gives you a way to restore the source state for a given binary.
This information could also be added to the version string like
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO does. OTOH rather than abusing the build date
(which may not mean much, but it nevertheless has a meaning), I'd rather
add the possibility to add extra information.
bye, ROman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists