[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d57814d0702181316k1b1dfc1en710c9c4a88e05476@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:16:55 +1000
From: "Trent Waddington" <trent.waddington@...il.com>
To: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>,
"Trent Waddington" <trent.waddington@...il.com>,
"Michael K. Edwards" <medwards.linux@...il.com>,
"Neil Brown" <neilb@...e.de>, davids@...master.com,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
On 2/18/07, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> Actually, the FSF and many of its representatives, has claimed, on
> many occassions, that the GPL infects across dynamic linking. That
> is, if you write your own code that calls readline which links via a
> dynamically linked shared library, and perhaps even across dlopen(),
> they claim that the GPL applies to the code which you write. Given
> that the only way this could happen is via copyright law, they are
> basically saying that if you use the readline interface, you have
> created a derived work and they therefore 0wn your source code.
Is that so?
> Whether or not this would be laughed out of court or not will very
> much depend on the local legal precedents (and Trent Waddington has
> quoted some very interesting legal cases based on US court decisions,
Wow? I did? Really? I must have been sleep typing.
Trent
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists