linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/44 take 2] [UBI] internal common header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1171883798.13817.13.camel@sauron>
Date:	Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:16:38 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Frank Haverkamp <haver@...t.ibm.com>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/44 take 2] [UBI] internal common header

On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 22:05 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > +/* Maximum number of supported UBI devices */
> > +#define UBI_MAX_INSTANCES 32
> 
> Does this need to be limited?

It is how this is implemented at the moment. Note, this limits number of
UBI devices, not ubi _volumes_.

> > +/* UBI error messages */
> > +#define ubi_err(fmt, ...)                                                   \
> > +	printk(UBI_ERR_LEVEL UBI_ERR_PREF " %s " fmt "\n", __FUNCTION__,    \
> > +	       ##__VA_ARGS__)
> 
> You shouldn't need these helpers, just use the regular dev_dbg, dev_info
> and related macros.

I will look at them and see if they are ok.

> > +struct ubi_info {
> > +	int ubi_num;
> > +	struct ubi_io_info   *io;
> > +	struct ubi_bgt_info  *bgt;
> > +	struct ubi_wl_info   *wl;
> > +	struct ubi_beb_info  *beb;
> > +	struct ubi_vmt_info  *vmt;
> > +	struct ubi_ivol_info *ivol;
> > +	struct ubi_vtbl_info *vtbl;
> > +	struct ubi_acc_info  *acc;
> > +	struct ubi_upd_info  *upd;
> > +	struct ubi_eba_info  *eba;
> > +	struct ubi_uif_info  *uif;
> > +};
> 
> I don't know what went wrong here, but this does not at all
> look ok. The members in here probably should all be part
> of the ubi_info structure itself.

Will be fixed, thanks.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/