[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070219150445.GC75@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:04:45 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/bridge/br_if.c: don't use _WORK_NAR
On 02/19, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:03:53PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 02/19, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> ...
> > kfree() doesn't check WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, it makes no
> > difference if it is set or not when work->func() runs.
>
> It looks like it's to be checked before kfree.
Here,
br_add_if:
schedule_delayed_work(&p->carrier_check, BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE);
schedule_delayed_work() fails if this bit is set. So the only difference with
this patch is:
before:
schedule_delayed_work() fails unless port_carrier_check() passed
work_release() (before rtnl_lock())
after:
schedule_delayed_work() fails unless run_workqueue() cleared this
bit (before calling port_carrier_check())
> > We are going to kill _NAR stuff.
>
> If you're sure nobody uses this in any way then it
> seems the right decision.
Yes, this series converts all users.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists