linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070219204703.GB31205@kvack.org>
Date:	Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:47:03 -0500
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Suparna bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Leonid Ananiev <leonid.i.ananiev@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:35:27PM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
> aio: propogate post-EIOCBQUEUED errors to completion event

This patch has to be split in 2 to make it easier to review -- the change 
moving the event insertion code for the completion queue should stand 
separately, as it is completely unrelated to the rest of the patch.  I 
*think* the patch is right, but picking the changes to the code and watching 
its movement at the same time is making my head spin.

		-ben
-- 
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <dont@...ck.org>.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/