linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev,mm: hecuba/E-Ink fbdev driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702200906070.2082@pademelon.sonytel.be>
Date:	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:07:56 +0100 (CET)
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Jaya Kumar <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com>
cc:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Frame Buffer Device Development 
	<linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20 1/1] fbdev,mm: hecuba/E-Ink fbdev driver

On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Jaya Kumar wrote:
> On 2/18/07, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> > Given that, this would have to be something that's dealt with at the
> > subsystem level rather than in individual drivers, hence the desire to
> > see something like this more generically visible.
> > 
> 
> Hi Peter, Paul, fbdev folk,
> 
> Ok. Here's what I'm thinking for abstracting this:
> 
> fbdev drivers would setup fb_mmap with their own_mmap as usual. In
> own_mmap, they would do what they normally do and setup a vm_ops. They
> are free to have their own nopage handler but would set the
> page_mkwrite handler to be fbdev_deferred_io_mkwrite().
> fbdev_deferred_io_mkwrite would build up the list of touched pages and
> pass it to a delayed workqueue which would then mkclean on each page
> and then pass a copy of that page list down to a driver's callback
> function. The fbdev driver's callback function can then do the actual
> IO to the framebuffer or coalesce DMA based on the provided page list.
> 
> I would like to add something like the following to struct fb_info:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_FB_DEFERRED_IO
> struct fb_deferred_io *defio;
> #endif

Don't you need a way to specify the maximum deferral time? E.g. a field in
fb_info.

> to store the mutex (to protect the page list), the touched page list,
> and the driver's callback function.
> 
> I hope this sounds sufficiently generic to meet everyone's (the two of
> us? :) needs.

Looks fine!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/