lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702201035.38874.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:38 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, discuss@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86_64: up to 255 or 256 CPUs?

On Tuesday 20 February 2007 01:42, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:06:47AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Quoting arch/x86_64/Kconfig:
> > <--  snip  -->
> > ...
> > config NR_CPUS
> >         int "Maximum number of CPUs (2-256)"
> >         range 2 255
> > ...
> > <--  snip  -->
> > cu
> > Adrian
> 
> The broadcast APIC ID clashes with the 256th cpu.

Yes 255 is theory. But we don't know if it actually works anyways because
it has been never tested.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ