[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070220125626.GC27551@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:56:26 -0600
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: "Kawai, Hidehiro" <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <soshima@...hat.com>,
"Hideo AOKI@...hat" <haoki@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] coredump: ELF-FDPIC: enable to omit anonymous shared memory
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:58:17AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Kawai, Hidehiro <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com> wrote:
> Actually, I don't think the locking is that hard or that complex.
>
> int do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs * regs)
> {
> <setup vars>
>
> down_read(&coredump_settings_sem);
>
> ...
>
> fail:
> up_read(&coredump_settings_sem);
> return retval;
> }
>
> And:
>
> static ssize_t proc_coredump_omit_anon_shared_write(struct file *file,
> const char __user *buf,
> size_t count,
> loff_t *ppos)
> {
> <setup vars>
>
> down_write(&coredump_settings_sem);
If the dump has started, do we want to change this to a trylock and skip
changing the value if it is already locked?
Thanks,
Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists