[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070220135044.GA11164@localhost.sw.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:50:44 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] {rd,wr}msr_on_cpu SMP=n optimization
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:14:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:07:13AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:14:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >...
> > > Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm3:
> > >...
> > > +rdmsr_on_cpu-wrmsr_on_cpu.patch
> > >...
> > > x86 updates
> > >...
> >
> > Let's save a few bytes in the CONFIG_SMP=n case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > BTW: currently -ENOUSERS
>
> There was a follow-on patch that converted p4-clockmod to use it for one.
And patch for powernow-k8 in preparations.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > void rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
> > void wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
> > +#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
> > +static inline void rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
> > +{
> > + rdmsr(msr_no, *l, *h);
> > +}
> > +static inline void wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
> > +{
> > + wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
> > +}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> BUG_ON(cpu!=smp_processor_id()) maybe?
This make sense. Fell free to add it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists