linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/44 take 2] [UBI] internal common header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1171985055.4039.44.camel@sauron>
Date:	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:24:15 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frank Haverkamp <haver@...t.ibm.com>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/44 take 2] [UBI] internal common header

On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 15:15 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 09:55 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > It appears that the reason why you are doing this is because you think
> > you need the (packed) attribute.  Not needed; Linux assumes all over
> > the place 16, 32, and 64 types are packed.  If Linux is ever compiled
> > on an architecture where this isn't true, the compiler will probably
> > need to be fixed so these assumptions are true, since all manner of
> > things will break.
> 
> No, the packedness is irrelevant -- the reason is just to catch all the
> places where you might otherwise forget to use byte-swapping accesses.

Bear in mind we share this header with user-space, so it is safer to use
packed as well as C99 types.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/