[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070220200550.GA85@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:05:50 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Gautham shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: slab: start_cpu_timer/cache_reap CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU problems
On 02/20, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>
> > > > Well seems that we have a set of unresolved issues with workqueues and cpu
> > > > hotplug.
> >
> > How about storing 'cpu' explicitly in the work queue instead of relying on the
> > smp_processor_id() and friends ? That way there is no ambiguity when
> > threads/timers get
> > moved around.
>
> The slab functionality is designed to work on the processor with the
> queue. These tricks will only cause more trouble in the future. The
> cache_reaper needs to be either disabled or run on the right processor. It
> should never run on the wrong processor.
I personally agree. Besides, cache_reaper is not alone. Note the comment
in debug_smp_processor_id() about cpu-bound processes. The slab does correct
thing right now, stops the timer on CPU_DEAD. Other problems imho should be
solved by fixing cpu-hotplug. Gautham and Srivatsa are working on that.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists