[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702201402420.17433@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:14:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Gautham shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: slab: start_cpu_timer/cache_reap CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU problems
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> Ok. Sounds like disabling cache_reaper is a better option for now. Like you
> said
> it's unlikely that slabs will grow much if that cpu is not heavily used by the
> kernel.
Running for prolonged times without cache_reaper is no good.
What we are talking about here is to disable the cache_reaper during cpu
shutdown. The slab cpu shutdown will clean the per cpu caches anyways so
we really do not need the slab_reaper running during cpu shutdown.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists