[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702201750030.11016@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:52:27 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
cc: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Add the code maturity levels DEPRECATED and
OBSOLETE.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 17:27, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> > Is that really the consensus on these definitions? I thought it was
> > more or less the opposite:
> >
> > * DEPRECATED == no (complete) replacement available yet, but it has
> > been decided that this code is less than optimal and
> > alternatives should be preferred
just to clarify this, that's not my idea of "deprecated".
"deprecated" means that there *is* a complete replacement available
*right now* and you should consider switching to it.
if you can't offer someone a completely functional, better alternative
to what they're using now, then you can't say that what they're using
now is deprecated.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists