linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 000 of 6] md: Assorted fixes and features for md for 2.6.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45DB82BC.60805@tmr.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:22:36 -0500
From:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 6] md: Assorted fixes and features for md for 2.6.21

NeilBrown wrote:
> Following 6 patches are against 2.6.20 and are suitable for 2.6.21.
> They are not against -mm because the new plugging makes raid5 not work
> and so not testable, and there are a few fairly minor intersections between
> these patches and those patches.
> There is also a very minor conflict with the hardware-xor patches - one line
> of context is different.
>
> Patch 1 should probably go in -stable - the bug could cause data
> corruption in a fairly uncommon raid10 configuration, so that one and
> this intro are Cc:ed to stable@...nel.org.
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
>  [PATCH 001 of 6] md: Fix raid10 recovery problem.
>  [PATCH 002 of 6] md: RAID6: clean up CPUID and FPU enter/exit code
>  [PATCH 003 of 6] md: Move warning about creating a raid array on partitions of the one device.
>  [PATCH 004 of 6] md: Clean out unplug and other queue function on md shutdown
>  [PATCH 005 of 6] md: Restart a (raid5) reshape that has been aborted due to a read/write error.
>  [PATCH 006 of 6] md: Add support for reshape of a raid6

Every month or so there are a bunch of patches like this, which do 
various enhancements to the kernel. And these are usually based against 
the release kernel, and all is fine. But every once in a while there is 
a patch which is more urgent, in this case the RAID10 one, which is 
really desirable to get into every kernel running on a machine. Are 
patches marked as needed for -stable also fast tracked to -git inclusion?

If this isn't in -git14 I'm going to rebuild with it before testing 
Neil's NFS stuff. The NFS server test data is on RAID10 ;-)

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@....com>
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc
  Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/