[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1172050562.3531.171.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:36:02 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, clameter@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu,
unionfs@...esystems.org, bunk@...sta.de, hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slab: introduce krealloc
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 11:33 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> > please mark this one __must_check.. not storing realloc() return values
> > is one of the more nasty types of bugs... but gcc can help us greatly
> > here ;)
>
> So I guess we want the same thing for the other allocator functions
> (__kmalloc et al) as well?
kmalloc doesn't normally get forgotten. realloc() otoh is a very classic
and far more frequent mistake....
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists