[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8347.1172057611@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:33:31 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "Kawai, Hidehiro" <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>,
Satoshi OSHIMA <soshima@...hat.com>,
"Hideo AOKI@...hat" <haoki@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] coredump: ELF-FDPIC: enable to omit anonymous shared memory
Kawai, Hidehiro <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com> wrote:
> Is coredump_setting_sem a global semaphore? If so, it prevents concurrent
> core dumping.
No, it doesn't. Look again:
int do_coredump(long signr, int exit_code, struct pt_regs * regs)
{
<setup vars>
>>>> down_read(&coredump_settings_sem);
> Additionally, while some process is dumped, writing to
> coredump_omit_anon_shared of unrelated process will be blocked.
Yes, but that's probably reasonable. How likely (a) is a process to coredump,
and (b) is a coredump to occur simultaneously with someone altering their
settings?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists