[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <45DC51CF.7090202@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:06:07 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, edmudama@...il.com,
Nicolas.Mailhot@...oste.net, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>, Ric Wheeler <ric@....com>,
Dongjun Shin <d.j.shin@...sung.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: libata FUA revisited
Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Aside from the issue above, as I mentioned elsewhere, lots of NCQ drives
>> don't support non-NCQ FUA writes..
>
> To me, using the NCQ FUA bit on such drives doesn't seem to be a good
> idea. Maybe I'm just too chicken but it's not like we can gain a lot
> from doing FUA at this point. Are there a lot of drives which support
> NCQ but not FUA opcodes?
Well, it's hard to say whether "lots" have this issue, but the ones I
have in my machine, Seagate 7200.7 NCQ 160GB (ST3160827AS) and 7200.10
320GB (ST3320620AS), both support NCQ and don't support non-NCQ FUA, and
those (especially the latter) seem to be very popular models.
Likely Seagate didn't implement that command since they figured nobody
would use that if they had NCQ..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists