linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.20-git15 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1172072023.25076.64.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:33:43 +0100
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-git15 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! - timers?

On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 23:37 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 20/02/07, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 19:54 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > >
> > > Might it be 6ba9b346e1e0eca65ec589d32de3a9fe32dc5de6 commit?
> >
> > I doubt that it is, but can you revert it ?
> 
> I'm using the latest kernel without this patch since 3 hours.
> 
> So far so good.

But you still have those softirq pending messages, right ? I think those
are pointing to the root cause of this. Still no idea how to get hold of
them. All my systems refuse to produce that. Hrmpf.

	tglx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/