[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1172075053.8577.38.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:24:13 -0800
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 20:53 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, the merge window for 2.6.21 has closed, and -rc1 is out there.
>
> There's a lot of changes, as is usual for an -rc1 thing, but at least so
> far it would seem that 2.6.20 has been a good base, and I don't think we
> have anything *really* scary here.
>
> The most interesting core change may be the dyntick/nohz one, where timer
> ticks will only happen when needed. It's been brewing for a _loong_ time,
> but it's in the standard kernel now as an option.
On i386 I get the following,
TCP cubic registered
NET: Registered protocol family 1
NET: Registered protocol family 17
Testing NMI watchdog ... CPU#0: NMI appears to be stuck (24->24)!
CPU#1: NMI appears to be stuck (0->0)!
CPU#2: NMI appears to be stuck (0->0)!
CPU#3: NMI appears to be stuck (0->0)!
when I add nmi_watchdog=1 to my boot args which worked on prior kernels.
On closer inspection it looks like arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c :
check_timer() --> timer_irq_works() depends on IRQ0 incrementing jiffies
which is no longer the case AFAIK.
I'm not sure exactly how that relates to the NMI, but the check_timer()
function disabled the NMI through the io-apic if it can't get the
"timer" working through the io-apic.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists