linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for paravirt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:37:46 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
cc:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for
 paravirt_ops interface

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> That was always its intention. It's not a direct interface to a hypervisor,
> but an somewhat abstracted interface to a "hypervisor driver" 

I thought that hypervisor driver was some binary blob that can be directly
accessed via paravirt_ops?

> But you're right that there are currently still quite a lot of hooks
> being added. I plan to be much more strict on that in the future.

And it seems that the hooks are not generic but bound to a particular 
hypervisor. Should the Xen specific stuff not be in the binary blob?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/