[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1HJwXe-0003bD-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:50:14 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: trond.myklebust@....uio.no
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, staubach@...hat.com, hugh@...itas.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
> > > > This flag is checked in msync() and __fput(), and if set, the file
> > > > times are updated and the flag is cleared
> > >
> > > Why not also check inside vfs_getattr?
> >
> > This is the minimum, that the standard asks for.
> >
> > Note, your porposal would touch the times in vfs_getattr(), which
> > means, that the modification times would depend on the time of the
> > last stat() call, which is not really right, though it would still be
> > conforming.
> >
> > It is much saner, if the modification time is always the time of the
> > last write() or msync().
>
> I disagree. The above doesn't allow a program like 'make' to discover
> whether or not the file has changed by simply calling stat(). Instead,
> you're forcing a call to msync()+stat().
Yes, but that's the only portable way _anyway_.
And it probably doesn't matter, programs using mmap to write to a file
_will_ call msync, or at least close the file, when they're done.
Thanks,
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists