[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45DCD9E5.2010106@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:46:45 -0800
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "Michael K. Edwards" <medwards.linux@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@....com.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] Syslets, "Threadlets", generic AIO support, v3
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> in terms of AIO, the best queueing model is i think what the kernel uses
> internally: freely ordered, with barrier support.
Speaking of AIO, how do you imagine lio_listio is implemented? If there
is no asynchronous syscall it would mean creating a threadlet for each
request but this means either waiting or creating several/many threads.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (252 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists