[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702212239270.30485@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:42:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
unionfs@...esystems.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] UNION_FS must depend on SLAB
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> I think we can merge krealloc without unionfs. I'll whoop up a new patch as
> per Christoph's suggestions. I think at least XFS already has its own realloc
> and there might be some other open-coded users. It's not _changing_ the slab
> as much as adding new functionality that makes sense fron a general point of
> view.
I really like the krealloc idea. Could we useful elsewhere to extend
objects and it is similar to the realloc() available in glibc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists