[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070222075623.GB9800@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:56:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speedup divides by cpu_power in scheduler
* Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> wrote:
> I noticed expensive divides done in try_to_wakeup() and
> find_busiest_group() on a bi dual core Opteron machine (total of 4
> cores), moderatly loaded (15.000 context switch per second)
>
> oprofile numbers :
nice patch! Ack for -mm testing:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
one general suggestion: could you rename ->cpu_power to ->__cpu_power?
That makes it perfectly clear that this field's semantics have changed
and that it should never be manipulated directly without also changing
->reciprocal_cpu_power, and will also flag any out of tree code
trivially.
> + * Divide a load by a sched group cpu_power : (load / sg->cpu_power)
> + * Since cpu_power is a 'constant', we can use a reciprocal divide.
> + */
> +static inline u32 sg_div_cpu_power(const struct sched_group *sg, u32 load)
> +{
> + return reciprocal_divide(load, sg->reciprocal_cpu_power);
> +}
> +/*
> + * Each time a sched group cpu_power is changed,
> + * we must compute its reciprocal value
> + */
> +static inline void sg_inc_cpu_power(struct sched_group *sg, u32 val)
> +{
> + sg->cpu_power += val;
> + BUG_ON(sg->cpu_power == 0);
> + sg->reciprocal_cpu_power = reciprocal_value(sg->cpu_power);
> +}
Could you remove the BUG_ON() - it will most likely cause the
non-inlining of these functions if CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y and
CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING is disabled (which is a popular combination in
distro kernels, it reduces the kernel's size by over 30%). And it's not
like we'll be able to overlook a divide by zero crash in
reciprocal_value() anyway, if cpu_power were to be zero ;-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists