[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070222095039.GR10425@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:50:39 -0500
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: -freg-struct-return?
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:09:04AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Do we know how many gcc bugs this has? (regparm used to have many)
> > other than that.. sounds like a win...
> >
>
> The documentation suggests that its the preferred mode of operation, and
> that its the default on platforms where gcc is the primary compiler. So
> the fact that it isn't for Linux suggests either an oversight or that it
> is actually broken...
It is used for Linux on many architectures (x86_64, sparc64, ia64,
ppc{,64}, arm, sh, m68k to name just a few), but it is an ABI decision,
so e.g. on i386 is not used by default as the ABI mandates structs/unions
are returned in memory.
Jakub
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists