[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0702221941290.7553@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:44:47 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
cc: dsaxena@...xity.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Modprobe as script breaks initramfs kernel?
On Feb 22 2007 14:30, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> We attempted an experiment in cleaning up some modprobe messages during
>> initramfs bootup when the modules directory is missing by moving modprobe
>> to modprobe-bin and replacing modprobe with the following simple shell script:
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> # Clean up bootup when modules are not present
>>
>> if [ -e "/lib/modules/'uname -r'/modules.dep" ] ; then
>> /sbin/modprobe-bin $*
The nitpick guide says: `uname -r` and "$@" instead of $* ;-)
>> else
>> exit 0
>> fi
>[]
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000014
>[]
>> Trace; c0107737 <sys_pipe+17/60>
>> Trace; c01030d7 <syscall_call+7/b>
>
>This is the same issue I reported much earlier with /sbin/hotplug being a script
>in initrfamfs. The problem is because pipefs isn't initialized yet at the time
>the script gets called, and causes a NULL-pointer deref. Obviously you're using
>pipe above.
Btw, has this pipefs issue been adressed (by moving pipefs before initramfs
stage), or something?
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists