[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200702221244.32442.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:44:31 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 0/6] rtc framework: remove class_device, use class suspend()/resume()
On Thursday 22 February 2007 10:09 am, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:45:14PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > The main point of this series of patches is that last one, which I'll
> > circulate just a bit more widely. (Although I think the first four are
> > also nice cleanups!) It might be the first example of a framework that
> > uses the "new" class level suspend()/resume() calls to offload drivers.
> >
> > ..
>
> All of these looks good to me, feel free to add an:
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> to them if you want.
Thanks ...
> thanks for doing the class_device removal work, I appreciate it.
Actually the class_device removal work was because that was the
only way to clean the RTC suspend()/remove() patch out of my
queue, where it's been sitting since not log after those class
suspend/resume methods started to circulate, early last summer.
It'll be good to have that finally gone!
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists